fall: be in running car

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rise
Weight: 0.63
, blow
Weight: 0.61
, hit
Weight: 0.61
, mistake
Weight: 0.60
Siblings falling
Weight: 0.34
, slide
Weight: 0.34
, jump
Weight: 0.33
, creep
Weight: 0.32
, down
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in running car 1.00
start car bad 0.85
be in cars 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(blow, be in cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fall, be in running car)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fall, be in running car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(blow, be in cars)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fall, be in running car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(blow, be in cars)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fall, be in running car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(jump, start car bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(blow, be in cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fall, be in running car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fall, be in running car)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fall, be in running car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(jump, start car bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(jump, start car bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fall, be in running car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fall, be in running car)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fall, be in running car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fall, be in running car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fall, be in running car)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fall, be in running car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fall, be in running car)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fall, be in running car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(blow, be in cars)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fall, be in running car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(jump, start car bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(fall, be in running car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(blow, be in cars)