fame: is alluring fpr

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents movie
Weight: 0.62
, tv show
Weight: 0.61
, television series
Weight: 0.60
, celebrity
Weight: 0.60
, show
Weight: 0.60
Siblings movie star
Weight: 0.34
, glory
Weight: 0.34
, idol
Weight: 0.33
, star
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is alluring fpr 1.00
is attractive 0.81
is fpr 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fame, is alluring fpr) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(movie star, is attractive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fame, is alluring fpr) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(movie star, is attractive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fame, is alluring fpr) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(movie star, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(movie star, is attractive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fame, is alluring fpr) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(movie star, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(movie star, is attractive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fame, is alluring fpr) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(fame, is alluring fpr)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fame, is alluring fpr) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fame, is attractive)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fame, is alluring fpr) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fame, is fpr)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fame, is alluring fpr) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(fame, is attractive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(fame, is alluring fpr) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(fame, is fpr)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(fame, is alluring fpr) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(fame, is attractive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(fame, is alluring fpr) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fame, is fpr)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(fame, is alluring fpr) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(fame, is attractive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fame, is alluring fpr) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(fame, is fpr)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(fame, is alluring fpr) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fame, is alluring fpr) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fame, is alluring fpr)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fame, is alluring fpr) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fame, is alluring fpr)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fame, is alluring fpr) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(movie star, is attractive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fame, is alluring fpr) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(movie star, is attractive)