fart: is bad word

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.66
, word
Weight: 0.56
, joke
Weight: 0.48
, sound
Weight: 0.45
, term
Weight: 0.43
Siblings oh
Weight: 0.35
, crap
Weight: 0.34
, hey
Weight: 0.34
, ping pong
Weight: 0.34
, cunt
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad word 1.00
is swear word 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fart, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cunt, is bad word)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fart, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cunt, is swear word)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fart, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crap, is bad word)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(fart, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(crap, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(crap, is bad word)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(fart, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cunt, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(cunt, is bad word)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(fart, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(cunt, is swear word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(cunt, is swear word)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(fart, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(fart, is bad word)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(fart, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(fart, is swear word)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(fart, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(fart, is swear word)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(fart, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(fart, is swear word)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(fart, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fart, is swear word)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(fart, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fart, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fart, is bad word)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(fart, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fart, is bad word)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fart, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(crap, is bad word)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fart, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(cunt, is swear word)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fart, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cunt, is bad word)