farting: has quality jokes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.50
, noise
Weight: 0.26
, nothing
Weight: 0.26
Siblings fart
Weight: 0.33
, poop
Weight: 0.32
, laughing
Weight: 0.32
, joke
Weight: 0.32
, dog poop
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality jokes 1.00
is funny 0.76
is damn funny 0.75
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(laughing, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(poop, is funny)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(dog poop, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(poop, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fart, is funny)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(laughing, is funny)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(joke, is funny)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(joke, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(joke, is funny)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(laughing, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(laughing, is funny)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fart, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(fart, is funny)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(laughing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(laughing, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(poop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(poop, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(poop, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(poop, is funny)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(dog poop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(dog poop, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(farting, has quality jokes)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(farting, is funny)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(farting, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(farting, is damn funny)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(farting, is damn funny)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(farting, is funny)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(farting, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(farting, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(farting, is funny)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(farting, is damn funny)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(farting, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(farting, is funny)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(farting, is damn funny)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(farting, has quality jokes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(farting, has quality jokes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(joke, is funny)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(laughing, is funny)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(laughing, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(poop, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(poop, is funny)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fart, is funny)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(farting, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(dog poop, has quality bad)