:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(farting, is funny)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(poop, is funny)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(farting, is funny)
⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fart, is funny)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(farting, is funny)
⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(joke, is funny)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(farting, is funny)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(joke, is rude)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(farting, is funny)
⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(farting, is rude)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(farting, is funny)
⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(joke, is funny)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(farting, is funny)
⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(joke, is rude)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(farting, is funny)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(poop, is funny)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(farting, is funny)
⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fart, is funny)