fast food chain: be at beijing

Related concepts

Parents	restaurant Weight: 0.74 , product Weight: 0.56 , business Weight: 0.56 , employer Weight: 0.55 , service Weight: 0.47
Siblings	fast food restaurant Weight: 0.42 , seafood restaurant Weight: 0.38 , food store Weight: 0.38 , italian restaurant Weight: 0.37 , chinese restaurant Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be at beijing	1.00
be at chinatown	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be at beijing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(fast food chain, be at beijing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(fast food chain, be at beijing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(fast food chain, be at beijing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(fast food chain, be at beijing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(fast food chain, be at beijing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be at beijing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(fast food chain, be at beijing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(fast food chain, be at beijing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be at beijing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown)