fast food restaurant: be used to eat

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.80
, junk food
Weight: 0.70
, food
Weight: 0.69
, place
Weight: 0.65
, location
Weight: 0.65
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.85
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, hamburger
Weight: 0.66
, subway
Weight: 0.59
, diner
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to eat 1.00
be used to eat at 0.99
be used to eat in 0.98
be used to eat to get food 0.94
be used to eat food 0.94
wants to eat 0.93
be used to eat out 0.93
be used to eat thing 0.92
be used to get something to eat 0.91
be eat by person 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat in)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(food, wants to eat)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(place, be used to eat to get food)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(place, be used to eat to get food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(food, wants to eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(place, be used to eat to get food)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, wants to eat)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat at)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(diner, be used to eat thing)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(diner, be used to eat in)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(diner, be used to get something to eat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat in)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(food, wants to eat)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(place, be used to eat to get food)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to eat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(diner, be used to eat in)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(diner, be used to eat in)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(diner, be used to eat thing)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(diner, be used to eat thing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(diner, be used to get something to eat)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(diner, be used to get something to eat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(fast food restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(fast food restaurant, be used to eat out)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat out)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat out)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat out)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(food, wants to eat)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(place, be used to eat to get food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to eat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(diner, be used to eat in)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(diner, be used to eat thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(diner, be used to get something to eat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(food, wants to eat)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(place, be used to eat to get food)