fast food: be used to eat

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to eat 1.00
be used to eat food 0.94
wants to eat 0.93
be used to person to eat 0.93
be used to eat out 0.93
be eat cook 0.91
be eat by person 0.90
be used to eat fast food 0.89
be cook before eat 0.88
be defined as something you can cook and eat 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to eat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to eat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(food, wants to eat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to eat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat out)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to eat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat fast food)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to eat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat out)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(food, wants to eat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat fast food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat out)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, wants to eat)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat fast food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be used to eat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(meat, be eat cook)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(meat, be used to person to eat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(meat, be cook before eat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to eat)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to eat)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(food, wants to eat)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to eat)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat out)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to eat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat fast food)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to eat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(hot dog, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be used to eat)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(meat, be used to person to eat)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(meat, be used to person to eat)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(meat, be cook before eat)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(meat, be cook before eat)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(meat, be eat cook)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(meat, be eat cook)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(fast food, be used to eat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to eat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat fast food)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat out)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(food, wants to eat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(hot dog, be used to eat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(meat, be eat cook)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(meat, be used to person to eat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(meat, be cook before eat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat fast food)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat out)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(food, wants to eat)