fast food restaurant: have secret menus

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.80
, junk food
Weight: 0.70
, food
Weight: 0.69
, place
Weight: 0.65
, location
Weight: 0.65
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.85
, taco bell
Weight: 0.74
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, hamburger
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
have secret menus 1.00
have menus 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(restaurant, have secret menus)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(place, have secret menus)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(restaurant, have menus)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(place, have secret menus)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(restaurant, have secret menus)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(restaurant, have menus)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(place, have secret menus)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, have secret menus)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, have menus)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(restaurant, have secret menus)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(place, have secret menus)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(restaurant, have menus)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, have menus)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(fast food restaurant, have menus)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, have menus)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, have menus)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(restaurant, have menus)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(place, have secret menus)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(restaurant, have secret menus)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(place, have secret menus)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(restaurant, have secret menus)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(restaurant, have menus)