restaurant: have secret menus

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.69
, grocery store
Weight: 0.68
, food store
Weight: 0.67
, institution
Weight: 0.64
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.87
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.81
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.80
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.80
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.77

Related properties

Property Similarity
have secret menus 1.00
have secret menu 0.95
have hidden menus 0.93
have menus 0.92
be with menus 0.92
be with menus considered 0.90
give kids menus 0.87
be with french menus 0.87
be with french menus considered 0.87
have menu 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, have secret menus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, have secret menus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, have secret menu)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, have secret menus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, have menus)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, have secret menus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, have menu)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(restaurant, have secret menus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, have secret menus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(restaurant, have secret menus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, have menus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, have menus)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(restaurant, have secret menus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, have secret menu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, have secret menu)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(restaurant, have secret menus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, have menu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, have menu)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(restaurant, have secret menus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(restaurant, have secret menus)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(restaurant, have secret menus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(restaurant, have menus)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(restaurant, have secret menus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(restaurant, have menus)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(restaurant, have secret menus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(restaurant, have menus)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(restaurant, have secret menus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(restaurant, have menu)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(restaurant, have secret menus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(restaurant, have menu)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(restaurant, have secret menus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(restaurant, have menu)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(restaurant, have secret menus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, have menus)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(restaurant, have secret menus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, have menu)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(restaurant, have secret menus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(restaurant, have secret menus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, have secret menus)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(restaurant, have secret menus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(restaurant, have secret menus)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, have secret menus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, have menus)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, have secret menus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, have menu)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, have secret menus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, have secret menus)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, have secret menus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, have secret menu)