fast food: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
contribute to problem 0.82
be problem in america 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(junk food, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fast food, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(fast food, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(junk food, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(junk food, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(fast food, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(fast food, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(fast food, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(fast food, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(fast food, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be problem in america)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(fast food, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fast food, be problem in america)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(fast food, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(fast food, be problem in america)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(fast food, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(fast food, be problem in america)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(fast food, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food, contribute to problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(fast food, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fast food, contribute to problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(fast food, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(fast food, contribute to problem)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(fast food, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(fast food, contribute to problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(fast food, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fast food, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(fast food, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fast food, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(junk food, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(fast food, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(junk food, has state problem)