fat: store food

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ingredient
Weight: 0.59
, raw material
Weight: 0.57
, characteristic
Weight: 0.57
, part
Weight: 0.57
Siblings animal fat
Weight: 0.62
, cream
Weight: 0.61
, sodium bicarbonate
Weight: 0.34
, protein
Weight: 0.34
, collagen
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
store food 1.00
be at fast-food restaurant 0.79
be buy from shop 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ingredient, be buy from shop)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fat, store food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fat, store food)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(ingredient, be buy from shop)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fat, store food)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(ingredient, be buy from shop)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ingredient, be buy from shop)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(fat, store food)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(fat, store food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fat, store food)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(fat, store food)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fat, store food)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(fat, store food)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(fat, store food)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fat, store food)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(fat, store food)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fat, store food)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fat, store food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fat, store food)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fat, store food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fat, store food)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ingredient, be buy from shop)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fat, store food)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ingredient, be buy from shop)