fat: be at fast-food restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ingredient
Weight: 0.59
, raw material
Weight: 0.57
, characteristic
Weight: 0.57
, part
Weight: 0.57
Siblings animal fat
Weight: 0.62
, cream
Weight: 0.61
, sodium bicarbonate
Weight: 0.34
, protein
Weight: 0.34
, collagen
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at fast-food restaurant 1.00
store food 0.79
be at in kitchen 0.77
be at kitchen 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(ingredient, be at in kitchen)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ingredient, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(ingredient, be at kitchen)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ingredient, be at in kitchen)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ingredient, be at in kitchen)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ingredient, be at kitchen)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(ingredient, be at in kitchen)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ingredient, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fat, store food)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fat, store food)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(fat, store food)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(fat, store food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ingredient, be at in kitchen)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(ingredient, be at kitchen)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ingredient, be at in kitchen)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(ingredient, be at kitchen)