ingredient: be at kitchen

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.68
, part
Weight: 0.56
, process
Weight: 0.55
, activity
Weight: 0.55
, key
Weight: 0.54
Siblings grain
Weight: 0.63
, wheat
Weight: 0.62
, rubber
Weight: 0.59
, fat
Weight: 0.59
, bark
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at kitchen 1.00
be at in kitchen 0.99
be at drawer by your bed 0.77
be at fast-food restaurant 0.76
be at drawer of night table 0.75
be at house 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(key, be at house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(ingredient, be at kitchen)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ingredient, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(key, be at house)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ingredient, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(key, be at house)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ingredient, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(rubber, be at drawer by your bed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ingredient, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(rubber, be at drawer of night table)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ingredient, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(key, be at house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(ingredient, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(ingredient, be at kitchen)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ingredient, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(fat, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ingredient, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(rubber, be at drawer by your bed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(rubber, be at drawer by your bed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ingredient, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(rubber, be at drawer of night table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(rubber, be at drawer of night table)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ingredient, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(ingredient, be at kitchen)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ingredient, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ingredient, be at in kitchen)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(ingredient, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ingredient, be at in kitchen)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(ingredient, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(ingredient, be at in kitchen)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(ingredient, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ingredient, be at in kitchen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(ingredient, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(ingredient, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ingredient, be at kitchen)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ingredient, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(ingredient, be at kitchen)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ingredient, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(key, be at house)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ingredient, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fat, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ingredient, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(rubber, be at drawer by your bed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ingredient, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rubber, be at drawer of night table)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(ingredient, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(key, be at house)