father: abuse sons

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grandfather
Weight: 0.79
, brother
Weight: 0.76
, son
Weight: 0.74
, mother
Weight: 0.70
Siblings husband
Weight: 0.70
, basil
Weight: 0.59
, patriarch
Weight: 0.48
, eusebius
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
abuse sons 1.00
abuse daughters 0.96
neglect sons 0.90
emotionally abuse daughters 0.88
hate sons 0.87
be important to sons 0.86
want sons 0.86
be abusive to daughters 0.86
love sons 0.86
leave sons 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(father, abuse sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(father, abuse sons)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(father, abuse sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(father, be abusive to daughters)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(father, abuse sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(father, be abusive to daughters)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(father, abuse sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(father, be abusive to daughters)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(father, abuse sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(father, hate sons)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(father, abuse sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(father, leave sons)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(father, abuse sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(father, hate sons)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(father, abuse sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(father, leave sons)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(father, abuse sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(father, be abusive to daughters)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(father, abuse sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(father, leave sons)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(father, abuse sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(father, neglect sons)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(father, abuse sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(father, hate sons)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(father, abuse sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(father, hate sons)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(father, abuse sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(father, leave sons)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(father, abuse sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(father, neglect sons)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(father, abuse sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(father, neglect sons)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(father, abuse sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(father, neglect sons)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(father, abuse sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(father, want sons)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(father, abuse sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(father, be important to sons)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(father, abuse sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(father, want sons)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(father, abuse sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(father, be important to sons)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(father, abuse sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(father, want sons)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(father, abuse sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(father, be important to sons)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(father, abuse sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(father, want sons)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(father, abuse sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(father, be important to sons)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(father, abuse sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(father, abuse sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(father, abuse sons)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(father, abuse sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(father, abuse sons)