father: neglect sons

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grandfather
Weight: 0.79
, brother
Weight: 0.76
, son
Weight: 0.74
, mother
Weight: 0.70
Siblings husband
Weight: 0.70
, basil
Weight: 0.59
, patriarch
Weight: 0.48
, eusebius
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
neglect sons 1.00
abuse sons 0.90
abuse daughters 0.87
hate sons 0.85
leave sons 0.84
want sons 0.84
be important to sons 0.84
love sons 0.83
be mean to sons 0.83
emotionally abuse daughters 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(father, neglect sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(father, neglect sons)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(father, neglect sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(father, leave sons)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(father, neglect sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(father, leave sons)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(father, neglect sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(father, leave sons)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(father, neglect sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(father, hate sons)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(father, neglect sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(father, hate sons)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(father, neglect sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(father, hate sons)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(father, neglect sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(father, leave sons)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(father, neglect sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(father, hate sons)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(father, neglect sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(father, be mean to sons)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(father, neglect sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(father, want sons)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(father, neglect sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(father, abuse sons)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(father, neglect sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(father, be important to sons)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(father, neglect sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(father, abuse sons)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(father, neglect sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(father, abuse sons)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(father, neglect sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(father, want sons)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(father, neglect sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(father, be mean to sons)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(father, neglect sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(father, abuse sons)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(father, neglect sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(father, be important to sons)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(father, neglect sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(father, want sons)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(father, neglect sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(father, want sons)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(father, neglect sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(father, be mean to sons)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(father, neglect sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(father, be mean to sons)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(father, neglect sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(father, be important to sons)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(father, neglect sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(father, be important to sons)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(father, neglect sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(father, neglect sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(father, neglect sons)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(father, neglect sons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(father, neglect sons)