fault: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.57
, abnormality
Weight: 0.55
, failure
Weight: 0.54
, product
Weight: 0.53
Siblings epicenter
Weight: 0.38
, conceit
Weight: 0.36
, mistake
Weight: 0.33
, heart failure
Weight: 0.32
, consequence
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality cost 0.85
has quality good 0.85
is quality 0.83
has quality bad 0.82
is value 0.79
is high quality 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fault, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fault, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(failure, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fault, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fault, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(mistake, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fault, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mistake, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fault, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(consequence, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fault, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(heart failure, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(fault, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fault, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fault, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(mistake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(mistake, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fault, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(heart failure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(heart failure, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fault, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(consequence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(consequence, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fault, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mistake, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(mistake, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fault, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(fault, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(fault, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fault, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fault, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fault, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fault, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fault, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(failure, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fault, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(mistake, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fault, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(consequence, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fault, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mistake, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fault, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(heart failure, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fault, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(failure, has quality good)