feedback: improve writing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.60
, tool
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.59
Siblings preview
Weight: 0.32
, experience
Weight: 0.32
, demo
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32
, information
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
improve writing 1.00
improve performance 0.80
enhance effectiveness of speaking 0.76
writing skill 0.76
enhance effectiveness of public speaking 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(feedback, improve writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(feedback, improve writing)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(feedback, improve writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(feedback, writing skill)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(feedback, improve writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(feedback, writing skill)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(feedback, improve writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(feedback, writing skill)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(feedback, improve writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(feedback, improve performance)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(feedback, improve writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(feedback, writing skill)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(feedback, improve writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(feedback, improve performance)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(feedback, improve writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(feedback, enhance effectiveness of public speaking)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(feedback, improve writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(feedback, improve performance)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(feedback, improve writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(feedback, improve performance)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(feedback, improve writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(feedback, enhance effectiveness of public speaking)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(feedback, improve writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(feedback, enhance effectiveness of public speaking)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(feedback, improve writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(feedback, enhance effectiveness of public speaking)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(feedback, improve writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(feedback, improve writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(feedback, improve writing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(feedback, improve writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(feedback, improve writing)