fender: be better than squier

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents guitar
Weight: 0.68
, brand
Weight: 0.64
, accessory
Weight: 0.59
, amp
Weight: 0.56
, bass
Weight: 0.56
Siblings windshield wiper
Weight: 0.35
, chevrolet
Weight: 0.34
, headlight
Weight: 0.34
, ibanez
Weight: 0.33
, toyota
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than squier 1.00
be cheaper than gibsons 0.84
be much cheaper than gibson 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(fender, be better than squier)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(fender, be better than squier)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(fender, be better than squier)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(fender, be cheaper than gibsons)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(fender, be better than squier)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fender, be cheaper than gibsons)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(fender, be better than squier)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fender, be cheaper than gibsons)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(fender, be better than squier)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fender, be cheaper than gibsons)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(fender, be better than squier)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(fender, be much cheaper than gibson)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(fender, be better than squier)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(fender, be much cheaper than gibson)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(fender, be better than squier)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(fender, be much cheaper than gibson)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(fender, be better than squier)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(fender, be much cheaper than gibson)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(fender, be better than squier)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(fender, be better than squier)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(fender, be better than squier)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(fender, be better than squier)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(fender, be better than squier)