fender: be cheaper than gibsons

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents guitar
Weight: 0.68
, brand
Weight: 0.64
, accessory
Weight: 0.59
, amp
Weight: 0.56
, bass
Weight: 0.56
Siblings windshield wiper
Weight: 0.35
, chevrolet
Weight: 0.34
, headlight
Weight: 0.34
, ibanez
Weight: 0.33
, toyota
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than gibsons 1.00
be much cheaper than gibson 0.85
be better than squier 0.84
be cheaper than gibson 0.84
is expensive 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(brand, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fender, be cheaper than gibsons)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(guitar, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fender, be cheaper than gibsons)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(accessory, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fender, be cheaper than gibsons)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(amp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fender, be cheaper than gibsons)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(amp, is expensive)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(accessory, is expensive)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(guitar, is expensive)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(brand, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(guitar, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(amp, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(accessory, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(brand, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(windshield wiper, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chevrolet, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(toyota, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(brand, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fender, be cheaper than gibsons)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(guitar, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fender, be cheaper than gibsons)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(accessory, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fender, be cheaper than gibsons)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(amp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fender, be cheaper than gibsons)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(toyota, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(toyota, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(chevrolet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(chevrolet, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(windshield wiper, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(windshield wiper, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(fender, be cheaper than gibsons)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(fender, be cheaper than gibson)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(fender, be cheaper than gibson)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(fender, be much cheaper than gibson)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(fender, be cheaper than gibson)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fender, be cheaper than gibson)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(fender, be better than squier)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(fender, be much cheaper than gibson)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(fender, be much cheaper than gibson)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(fender, be better than squier)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(fender, be much cheaper than gibson)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fender, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fender, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(fender, be better than squier)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(fender, be better than squier)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(fender, is expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(fender, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fender, be cheaper than gibsons)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fender, be cheaper than gibsons)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(amp, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(accessory, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(brand, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(guitar, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(toyota, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chevrolet, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(windshield wiper, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(amp, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(accessory, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(brand, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fender, be cheaper than gibsons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(guitar, is expensive)