fet: be better than bjt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.54
, electronic device
Weight: 0.46
, transistor
Weight: 0.42
, semiconductor
Weight: 0.38
Siblings jfet
Weight: 0.36
, vcr
Weight: 0.32
, pda
Weight: 0.32
, nintendo
Weight: 0.31
, crt
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than bjt 1.00
has quality better 0.86
be any better 0.84
be better than other values 0.84
be better than values 0.83
is faster 0.81
get smaller 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fet, be better than bjt)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(transistor, is faster)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fet, be better than bjt)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(transistor, be better than other values)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fet, be better than bjt)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(transistor, be better than values)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fet, be better than bjt)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(transistor, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fet, be better than bjt)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(electronic device, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fet, be better than bjt)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(electronic device, get smaller)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(transistor, be better than other values)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(transistor, be better than values)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(transistor, get smaller)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(transistor, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(transistor, is faster)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, get smaller)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(transistor, be better than other values)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(transistor, get smaller)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(transistor, be better than values)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(transistor, is faster)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(transistor, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(crt, be any better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crt, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fet, be better than bjt)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(transistor, be better than other values)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fet, be better than bjt)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(transistor, is faster)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fet, be better than bjt)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(transistor, be better than values)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fet, be better than bjt)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(transistor, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fet, be better than bjt)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(electronic device, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fet, be better than bjt)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(crt, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(crt, has quality better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(crt, be any better)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(crt, be any better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(fet, be better than bjt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fet, be better than bjt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fet, be better than bjt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(electronic device, get smaller)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(transistor, be better than values)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(transistor, be better than other values)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(transistor, get smaller)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(transistor, has quality better)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(transistor, is faster)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(crt, be any better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(crt, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(electronic device, get smaller)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(transistor, be better than values)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(transistor, be better than other values)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(transistor, get smaller)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(transistor, has quality better)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(transistor, is faster)