transistor: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.65
, semiconductor
Weight: 0.64
, electrode
Weight: 0.60
, device
Weight: 0.59
Siblings capacitor
Weight: 0.62
, fet
Weight: 0.42
, silicon
Weight: 0.38
, silicon carbide
Weight: 0.37
, diode
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
is quality 0.89
be better than bjt 0.86
be better than other values 0.81
be better than values 0.80
improves performance 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(transistor, has quality better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(transistor, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(diode, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(diode, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(silicon, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fet, be better than bjt)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(transistor, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(transistor, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(silicon, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(silicon, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fet, be better than bjt)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fet, be better than bjt)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(diode, is quality)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(diode, is quality)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(diode, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(diode, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(transistor, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(transistor, be better than other values)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(transistor, be better than values)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(transistor, be better than other values)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(transistor, be better than other values)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(transistor, be better than values)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(transistor, be better than values)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(transistor, be better than other values)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(transistor, be better than values)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(transistor, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(transistor, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fet, be better than bjt)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(silicon, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(diode, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(diode, is quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(transistor, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)