silicon: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents semiconductor
Weight: 0.75
, silicon carbide
Weight: 0.69
, mineral
Weight: 0.67
, raw material
Weight: 0.66
, substrate
Weight: 0.62
Siblings germanium
Weight: 0.39
, transistor
Weight: 0.38
, magnesium oxide
Weight: 0.36
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.36
, iron oxide
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is quality 0.91
has shape solid 0.79
has quality resources 0.79
has quality resource 0.79
be bad for environment 0.77
contribute to good health 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(mineral, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(silicon, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(mineral, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mineral, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, has shape solid)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(iron oxide, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(germanium, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(iron oxide, is quality)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(microprocessor, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(transistor, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(mineral, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(silicon, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(germanium, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(germanium, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(microprocessor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(microprocessor, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(transistor, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(transistor, has quality better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(magnesium oxide, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(magnesium oxide, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(magnesium oxide, is quality)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(iron oxide, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(iron oxide, is quality)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(magnesium oxide, has shape solid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(magnesium oxide, has shape solid)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(iron oxide, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(iron oxide, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(silicon, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(silicon, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(silicon, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(magnesium oxide, has shape solid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(germanium, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(transistor, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(iron oxide, be bad for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(microprocessor, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iron oxide, is quality)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(magnesium oxide, is quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(silicon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)