fiber optics: be faster than copper

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents optics
Weight: 0.81
, technology
Weight: 0.73
, material
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.64
Siblings camera lens
Weight: 0.36
, lens
Weight: 0.35
, microwave
Weight: 0.35
, laser
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be faster than copper 1.00
replace copper wires 0.81
be better than cable 0.76
is better then metal cables 0.76
is better metal cables 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fiber optics, be faster than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(fiber optics, be faster than copper)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fiber optics, be faster than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(fiber optics, be better than cable)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(fiber optics, be faster than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, be better than cable)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(fiber optics, be faster than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(fiber optics, be better than cable)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(fiber optics, be faster than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, is better metal cables)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(fiber optics, be faster than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(fiber optics, be better than cable)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(fiber optics, be faster than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(fiber optics, is better metal cables)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(fiber optics, be faster than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, is better then metal cables)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fiber optics, be faster than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(fiber optics, is better metal cables)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(fiber optics, be faster than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(fiber optics, is better then metal cables)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(fiber optics, be faster than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, replace copper wires)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fiber optics, be faster than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(fiber optics, is better then metal cables)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(fiber optics, be faster than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fiber optics, is better metal cables)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(fiber optics, be faster than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fiber optics, replace copper wires)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(fiber optics, be faster than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fiber optics, is better then metal cables)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fiber optics, be faster than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(fiber optics, replace copper wires)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(fiber optics, be faster than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(fiber optics, replace copper wires)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(fiber optics, be faster than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(fiber optics, be faster than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, be faster than copper)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fiber optics, be faster than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(fiber optics, be faster than copper)