fiber optics: replace copper wires

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents optics
Weight: 0.81
, technology
Weight: 0.73
, material
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.64
Siblings camera lens
Weight: 0.36
, lens
Weight: 0.35
, microwave
Weight: 0.35
, laser
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
replace copper wires 1.00
is metal cables 0.83
is then metal cables 0.83
is better metal cables 0.83
is better then metal cables 0.82
be faster than copper 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(fiber optics, replace copper wires)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(fiber optics, replace copper wires)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(fiber optics, replace copper wires)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(fiber optics, is metal cables)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(fiber optics, replace copper wires)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(fiber optics, is metal cables)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(fiber optics, replace copper wires)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(fiber optics, is then metal cables)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(fiber optics, replace copper wires)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(fiber optics, is then metal cables)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fiber optics, replace copper wires)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fiber optics, is metal cables)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(fiber optics, replace copper wires)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, is metal cables)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(fiber optics, replace copper wires)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(fiber optics, is better metal cables)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(fiber optics, replace copper wires)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, is better metal cables)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fiber optics, replace copper wires)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fiber optics, is then metal cables)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(fiber optics, replace copper wires)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(fiber optics, is better metal cables)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(fiber optics, replace copper wires)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, is then metal cables)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(fiber optics, replace copper wires)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(fiber optics, is better then metal cables)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(fiber optics, replace copper wires)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(fiber optics, be faster than copper)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(fiber optics, replace copper wires)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, is better then metal cables)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(fiber optics, replace copper wires)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(fiber optics, be faster than copper)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fiber optics, replace copper wires)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fiber optics, is better metal cables)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(fiber optics, replace copper wires)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(fiber optics, is better then metal cables)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fiber optics, replace copper wires)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(fiber optics, be faster than copper)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(fiber optics, replace copper wires)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, be faster than copper)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fiber optics, replace copper wires)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fiber optics, is better then metal cables)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(fiber optics, replace copper wires)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fiber optics, replace copper wires)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, replace copper wires)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(fiber optics, replace copper wires)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fiber optics, replace copper wires)