ficus: be at tropical region

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tree
Weight: 0.72
, plant
Weight: 0.61
, shrub
Weight: 0.46
, variety
Weight: 0.37
, member
Weight: 0.28
Siblings oak tree
Weight: 0.38
, cherry tree
Weight: 0.38
, apple tree
Weight: 0.38
, maple tree
Weight: 0.38
, christmas tree
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at tropical region 1.00
be at tropical forest 0.88
be at tropical landscape 0.87
be at tropical zone 0.87
be at tropical rainforest 0.87
be at all world tropic 0.81
be at tropic 0.79
be at rhode island 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at rhode island)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(ficus, be at tropical region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(apple tree, be at rhode island) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at rhode island)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(ficus, be at tropical region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(ficus, be at tropical region)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(ficus, be at tropical region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at tropical rainforest)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(ficus, be at tropical region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at tropical forest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(ficus, be at tropical region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(ficus, be at tropical forest)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(ficus, be at tropical region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(ficus, be at tropical rainforest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(ficus, be at tropical region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(ficus, be at tropical zone)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical rainforest)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical zone)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(ficus, be at tropical region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at tropical zone)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(ficus, be at tropical region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at tropic)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(ficus, be at tropical region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(ficus, be at all world tropic)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(ficus, be at tropical region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ficus, be at tropical forest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(ficus, be at tropical region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(ficus, be at tropic)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropic)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at all world tropic)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(ficus, be at tropical region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ficus, be at tropical rainforest)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(ficus, be at tropical region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(ficus, be at tropical zone)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(ficus, be at tropical region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at all world tropic)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(ficus, be at tropical region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ficus, be at all world tropic)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(ficus, be at tropical region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ficus, be at tropic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(ficus, be at tropical region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(ficus, be at tropical region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical region)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(ficus, be at tropical region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(ficus, be at tropical region)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at rhode island)