fig: go quickly bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit
Weight: 0.67
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.64
, crop
Weight: 0.59
, plant
Weight: 0.57
Siblings apple tree
Weight: 0.37
, pear tree
Weight: 0.37
, peach tree
Weight: 0.37
, pear
Weight: 0.36
, grape
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
go quickly bad 1.00
go bad 0.89
be good for us 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fig, go quickly bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good for us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fig, go quickly bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pear, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pear, be good for us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fig, go quickly bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(fig, go quickly bad)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fig, go quickly bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(fig, go bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(fig, go quickly bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(fig, go bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(fig, go quickly bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(fig, go bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(fig, go quickly bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(fig, go bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(fig, go quickly bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fig, be good for us)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(fig, go quickly bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fig, be good for us)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fig, go quickly bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(fig, be good for us)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(fig, go quickly bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(fig, be good for us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(fig, go quickly bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fig, go quickly bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fig, go quickly bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fig, go quickly bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fig, go quickly bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fig, go quickly bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pear, be good for us)