fig: have calories

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit
Weight: 0.67
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.64
, crop
Weight: 0.59
, plant
Weight: 0.57
Siblings apple tree
Weight: 0.37
, pear tree
Weight: 0.37
, peach tree
Weight: 0.37
, pear
Weight: 0.36
, grape
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have calories 1.00
have more calories 0.99
have many calories 0.98
be high in calories 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(fig, have calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pear, be high in calories)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fig, have calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(pear, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(pear, be high in calories)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fig, have calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(fig, have calories)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(fig, have calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fig, have more calories)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(fig, have calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fig, have many calories)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(fig, have calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fig, be high in calories)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(fig, have calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(fig, have more calories)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(fig, have calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(fig, be high in calories)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fig, have calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(fig, have more calories)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(fig, have calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(fig, have many calories)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fig, have calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fig, be high in calories)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(fig, have calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fig, be high in calories)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fig, have calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(fig, have many calories)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(fig, have calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fig, have many calories)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(fig, have calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(fig, have more calories)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(fig, have calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fig, have calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(fig, have calories)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fig, have calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fig, have calories)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(fig, have calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(pear, be high in calories)