fig: is tree israel

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit
Weight: 0.67
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.64
, crop
Weight: 0.59
, plant
Weight: 0.57
Siblings apple tree
Weight: 0.37
, pear tree
Weight: 0.37
, peach tree
Weight: 0.37
, pear
Weight: 0.36
, grape
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is tree israel 1.00
fall off tree 0.77
split on tree 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(fig, is tree israel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pear, fall off tree)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(fig, is tree israel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pear, split on tree)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(fig, is tree israel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(pear, fall off tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(pear, fall off tree)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(fig, is tree israel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(pear, split on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(pear, split on tree)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(fig, is tree israel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(fig, is tree israel)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fig, is tree israel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(fig, split on tree)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fig, is tree israel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fig, fall off tree)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(fig, is tree israel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fig, split on tree)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(fig, is tree israel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(fig, fall off tree)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(fig, is tree israel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(fig, split on tree)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(fig, is tree israel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(fig, fall off tree)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(fig, is tree israel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fig, split on tree)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(fig, is tree israel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fig, fall off tree)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(fig, is tree israel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fig, is tree israel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(fig, is tree israel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(fig, is tree israel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fig, is tree israel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(fig, is tree israel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(pear, fall off tree)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(fig, is tree israel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(pear, split on tree)