filibuster: has quality full

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.59
, rule
Weight: 0.58
, action
Weight: 0.47
, thing
Weight: 0.46
Siblings amendment
Weight: 0.32
, legislation
Weight: 0.32
, common law
Weight: 0.31
, tape measure
Weight: 0.31
, prohibition
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality full 1.00
full 0.90
has quality good 0.84
has quality bad 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(filibuster, has quality full)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(legislation, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amendment, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(amendment, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(filibuster, has quality full)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(common law, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(common law, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(legislation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(legislation, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(amendment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(amendment, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(prohibition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(prohibition, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(common law, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(common law, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(prohibition, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(prohibition, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(amendment, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(amendment, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(filibuster, has quality full)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(filibuster, full)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(filibuster, full)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(filibuster, full)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(filibuster, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(filibuster, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(filibuster, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(filibuster, full)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(filibuster, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(filibuster, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(filibuster, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(filibuster, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(filibuster, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(filibuster, has quality full)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(filibuster, has quality full)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(prohibition, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(legislation, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(amendment, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(common law, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(common law, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(prohibition, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(amendment, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(filibuster, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)