financing: is bad idea

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.57
, problem
Weight: 0.57
, subject
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bridge loan
Weight: 0.64
, lease
Weight: 0.61
, mortgage lender
Weight: 0.34
, loan
Weight: 0.33
, investment
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad idea 1.00
is good idea 0.97
is idea 0.94
be with johnnys idea 0.93
is good thing 0.83
is thing 0.79
be with johnny 's idea 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(problem, be with johnnys idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(financing, is bad idea)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(problem, be with johnny 's idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(financing, is bad idea)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(problem, be with johnnys idea)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(problem, be with johnny 's idea)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(problem, be with johnny 's idea)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(problem, be with johnnys idea)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(investment, is good thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(problem, be with johnnys idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(financing, is bad idea)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(problem, be with johnny 's idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(financing, is bad idea)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(investment, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(investment, is good thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(financing, is bad idea)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(financing, is idea)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(financing, is good idea)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(financing, is idea)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(financing, is idea)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(financing, is good idea)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(financing, is good idea)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(financing, is thing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(financing, is good thing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(financing, is thing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(financing, is good idea)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(financing, is good thing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(financing, is good thing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(financing, is thing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(financing, is idea)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(financing, is good thing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(financing, is thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(financing, is bad idea)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(financing, is bad idea)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(problem, be with johnnys idea)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(problem, be with johnny 's idea)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(investment, is good thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(problem, be with johnnys idea)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(problem, be with johnny 's idea)