from Quasimodo

## Related concepts

 Parents financial institutionWeight: 0.58, issueWeight: 0.57, problemWeight: 0.57, subjectWeight: 0.57 Siblings bridge loanWeight: 0.64, leaseWeight: 0.61, mortgage lenderWeight: 0.34, loanWeight: 0.33, investmentWeight: 0.33

## Related properties

 Similarity Property is bad idea 1.00 is good idea 0.97 is idea 0.94 be with johnnys idea 0.93 is good thing 0.83 is thing 0.79 be with johnny 's idea 0.78

## Clauses

### Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(problem, be with johnnys idea)
Evidence: 0.70
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(problem, be with johnny 's idea)
Evidence: 0.70

### Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(problem, be with johnnys idea)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(problem, be with johnny 's idea)

### Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(problem, be with johnny 's idea)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(problem, be with johnnys idea)

### Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(investment, is good thing)

### Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(problem, be with johnnys idea)
Evidence: 0.73
Evidence: 0.70
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(problem, be with johnny 's idea)
Evidence: 0.73
Evidence: 0.70

### Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(investment, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(investment, is good thing)

### Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Evidence: 0.83

### Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(financing, is idea)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(financing, is good idea)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(financing, is idea)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(financing, is idea)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(financing, is good idea)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(financing, is good idea)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(financing, is thing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(financing, is good thing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(financing, is thing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(financing, is good idea)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(financing, is good thing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(financing, is good thing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(financing, is thing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(financing, is idea)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(financing, is good thing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(financing, is thing)

### Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Evidence: 0.73

### Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Evidence: 0.70

### Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(problem, be with johnnys idea)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(problem, be with johnny 's idea)

### Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(investment, is good thing)

### Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70