financing: is idea

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.57
, problem
Weight: 0.57
, subject
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bridge loan
Weight: 0.64
, lease
Weight: 0.61
, mortgage lender
Weight: 0.34
, loan
Weight: 0.33
, investment
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is idea 1.00
be with johnnys idea 0.97
is good idea 0.96
is bad idea 0.94
is thing 0.77
be with johnny 's idea 0.76
is good thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(problem, be with johnnys idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(financing, is idea)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(problem, be with johnny 's idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(financing, is idea)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(problem, be with johnnys idea)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(problem, be with johnny 's idea)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(problem, be with johnny 's idea)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(problem, be with johnnys idea)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(investment, is good thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(problem, be with johnnys idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(financing, is idea)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(problem, be with johnny 's idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(financing, is idea)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(investment, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(investment, is good thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(financing, is idea)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(financing, is good idea)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(financing, is bad idea)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(financing, is thing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(financing, is thing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(financing, is good thing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(financing, is thing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(financing, is good idea)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(financing, is good idea)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(financing, is good idea)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(financing, is bad idea)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(financing, is good thing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(financing, is thing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(financing, is good thing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(financing, is good thing)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(financing, is bad idea)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(financing, is bad idea)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(financing, is idea)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(financing, is idea)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(problem, be with johnnys idea)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(problem, be with johnny 's idea)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(investment, is good thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(problem, be with johnnys idea)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(financing, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(problem, be with johnny 's idea)