finding: be in world

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents challenge
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings discovery
Weight: 0.61
, white matter
Weight: 0.48
, ascites
Weight: 0.40
, syndactyly
Weight: 0.38
, think
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in world 1.00
relate to world 0.81
relate to real world 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(problem, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(finding, be in world)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(finding, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(problem, be in world)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(finding, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(problem, be in world)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(problem, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(finding, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(finding, be in world)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(finding, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(finding, be in world)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(finding, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(finding, relate to world)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(finding, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(finding, relate to world)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(finding, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(finding, relate to real world)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(finding, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(finding, relate to world)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(finding, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(finding, relate to real world)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(finding, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(finding, relate to real world)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(finding, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(finding, relate to real world)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(finding, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(finding, relate to world)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(finding, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(finding, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(finding, be in world)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(finding, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(finding, be in world)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(finding, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(problem, be in world)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(finding, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(problem, be in world)