finland: is developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents europe
Weight: 0.56
, nation
Weight: 0.54
, switzerland
Weight: 0.53
, south america
Weight: 0.53
Siblings sweden
Weight: 0.34
, germany
Weight: 0.34
, italy
Weight: 0.34
, latin america
Weight: 0.34
, spain
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is developed 1.00
is developed country 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(south america, is developed)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(finland, is developed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(europe, is developed)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(finland, is developed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(switzerland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(finland, is developed)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(europe, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(finland, is developed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(switzerland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(finland, is developed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(switzerland, is developed country)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(switzerland, is developed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(europe, is developed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(europe, is developed country)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(south america, is developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(south america, is developed)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, is developed country)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, is developed)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(europe, is developed)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(europe, is developed country)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(sweden, is developed country)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sweden, is developed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is developed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(germany, is developed country)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(south america, is developed)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(finland, is developed)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(europe, is developed)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(finland, is developed)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(switzerland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(finland, is developed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(europe, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(finland, is developed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(switzerland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(finland, is developed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(sweden, is developed)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(sweden, is developed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(latin america, is developed)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(latin america, is developed)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(germany, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(germany, is developed country)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(sweden, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(sweden, is developed country)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(finland, is developed)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(finland, is developed country)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(finland, is developed country)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(finland, is developed country)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(finland, is developed country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(finland, is developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(finland, is developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(europe, is developed country)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(switzerland, is developed country)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(europe, is developed)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(switzerland, is developed)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(south america, is developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(germany, is developed country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(sweden, is developed country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(sweden, is developed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(latin america, is developed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(europe, is developed country)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(europe, is developed)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(switzerland, is developed country)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(switzerland, is developed)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(finland, is developed)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(south america, is developed)