fireplace: have glass doors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.60
, dining room
Weight: 0.60
, dining table
Weight: 0.59
, source
Weight: 0.58
Siblings stove
Weight: 0.60
, kitchen
Weight: 0.36
, living room
Weight: 0.35
, master bedroom
Weight: 0.34
, coffee table
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have glass doors 1.00
is door 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(fireplace, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(stove, is door)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fireplace, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(stove, is door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(stove, is door)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fireplace, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(fireplace, have glass doors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(fireplace, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(fireplace, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(fireplace, have glass doors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fireplace, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(fireplace, have glass doors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(fireplace, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(stove, is door)