stove: is door

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents household appliance
Weight: 0.64
, equipment
Weight: 0.61
, kitchen
Weight: 0.61
, heater
Weight: 0.61
, fireplace
Weight: 0.60
Siblings toaster oven
Weight: 0.38
, microwave oven
Weight: 0.37
, water heater
Weight: 0.37
, refrigerator
Weight: 0.36
, clothes dryer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is door 1.00
have doors 0.88
have screen on glass door 0.86
have glass doors 0.84
be hot on door seal 0.83
be hot between doors 0.80
have magnetic doors 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fireplace, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(stove, is door)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(stove, is door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(fireplace, have glass doors)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(stove, is door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(fireplace, have glass doors)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(stove, is door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, have screen on glass door)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(stove, is door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(refrigerator, be hot on door seal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(stove, is door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(refrigerator, have magnetic doors)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(stove, is door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(refrigerator, be hot between doors)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fireplace, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(stove, is door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(stove, is door)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(stove, is door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(microwave oven, have screen on glass door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(microwave oven, have screen on glass door)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(stove, is door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(refrigerator, be hot on door seal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(refrigerator, be hot on door seal)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(stove, is door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(refrigerator, be hot between doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(refrigerator, be hot between doors)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(stove, is door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(refrigerator, have magnetic doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(refrigerator, have magnetic doors)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(stove, is door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(stove, is door)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(stove, is door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(stove, is door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(stove, is door)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(stove, is door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(stove, is door)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(stove, is door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(fireplace, have glass doors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(stove, is door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(microwave oven, have screen on glass door)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(stove, is door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(refrigerator, be hot on door seal)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(stove, is door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(refrigerator, be hot between doors)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(stove, is door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(refrigerator, have magnetic doors)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(stove, is door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(fireplace, have glass doors)