firewall: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents security system
Weight: 0.69
, network device
Weight: 0.67
, hardware
Weight: 0.62
, application
Weight: 0.62
Siblings gas pedal
Weight: 0.50
, computer network
Weight: 0.36
, router
Weight: 0.36
, server
Weight: 0.35
, security guard
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
has quality shit 0.79
is consistently terrible 0.78
has quality question 0.77
has quality questions 0.76
is best 0.76
be bad today 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(network device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(firewall, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(security system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(firewall, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(network device, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(firewall, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(security system, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(firewall, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(security system, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(security system, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(security system, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(security system, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(gas pedal, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(server, be bad today)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(computer network, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality questions)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality question)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(network device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(firewall, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(security system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(firewall, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(network device, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(firewall, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(security system, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(firewall, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(computer network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(computer network, is quality)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(gas pedal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(gas pedal, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(computer network, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality question)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(computer network, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality questions)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(server, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(server, be bad today)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(firewall, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(firewall, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(firewall, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(security system, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(security system, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(network device, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(computer network, is quality)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(gas pedal, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality question)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality questions)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(server, be bad today)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(security system, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(security system, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(network device, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(firewall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)