firm: go public

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents law firm
Weight: 0.81
, financial institution
Weight: 0.61
, institution
Weight: 0.58
, member
Weight: 0.57
Siblings software company
Weight: 0.70
, ubs
Weight: 0.64
, vanguard
Weight: 0.58
, boeing
Weight: 0.57
, renault
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
go public 1.00
go public brau 1.00
go private 0.85
go public evidence 0.84
go brau 0.79
go public evidence from banking industry 0.77
be different from public member 0.76
create public relations departments 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(law firm, go public)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(firm, go public)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(firm, go public)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(law firm, go public)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(firm, go public)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(law firm, go public)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(law firm, go public)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(firm, go public)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(firm, go public)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(firm, go public)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(firm, go public)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(firm, go public)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(firm, go public)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(firm, go public)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(firm, go public)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(firm, go public)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(firm, go public)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(firm, go public)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(firm, go public)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(firm, go public)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(firm, go public)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(law firm, go public)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(firm, go public)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(law firm, go public)