fisherman: be at boat

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.62
, people
Weight: 0.57
, fish
Weight: 0.56
Siblings sailor
Weight: 0.35
, carpenter
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at boat 1.00
row boat 0.88
row skiff 0.85
row dory 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fish, be at boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fisherman, be at boat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(man, row boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fisherman, be at boat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fisherman, be at boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(fish, be at boat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fisherman, be at boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(man, row boat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fisherman, be at boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at boat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fisherman, be at boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(man, row boat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fish, be at boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(fisherman, be at boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(fisherman, be at boat)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(man, row boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(fisherman, be at boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(fisherman, be at boat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fisherman, be at boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(fisherman, be at boat)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(fisherman, be at boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(fisherman, row boat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fisherman, be at boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fisherman, row skiff)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(fisherman, be at boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(fisherman, row skiff)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(fisherman, be at boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fisherman, row boat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fisherman, be at boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(fisherman, row boat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(fisherman, be at boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(fisherman, row dory)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(fisherman, be at boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fisherman, row dory)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(fisherman, be at boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fisherman, row skiff)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fisherman, be at boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fisherman, row dory)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(fisherman, be at boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(fisherman, row boat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(fisherman, be at boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fisherman, row skiff)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(fisherman, be at boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(fisherman, row dory)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(fisherman, be at boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fisherman, be at boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fisherman, be at boat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fisherman, be at boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fisherman, be at boat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fisherman, be at boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fish, be at boat)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fisherman, be at boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(man, row boat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(fisherman, be at boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fish, be at boat)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(fisherman, be at boat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(man, row boat)