fisherman: row dory

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.62
, people
Weight: 0.57
, fish
Weight: 0.56
Siblings sailor
Weight: 0.35
, carpenter
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
row dory 1.00
row boat 0.86
row skiff 0.79
be at boat 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(man, row boat)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(fisherman, row dory)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fish, be at boat)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(fisherman, row dory)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fisherman, row dory)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(man, row boat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fisherman, row dory)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(fish, be at boat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fisherman, row dory)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(man, row boat)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fisherman, row dory)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at boat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(man, row boat)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(fisherman, row dory)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fisherman, row dory)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fish, be at boat)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(fisherman, row dory)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fisherman, row dory)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fisherman, row dory)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(fisherman, row dory)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(fisherman, row dory)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(fisherman, row boat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fisherman, row dory)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(fisherman, row boat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(fisherman, row dory)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fisherman, be at boat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fisherman, row dory)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fisherman, row skiff)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(fisherman, row dory)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fisherman, row skiff)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fisherman, row dory)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(fisherman, be at boat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(fisherman, row dory)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fisherman, row boat)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(fisherman, row dory)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(fisherman, row boat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(fisherman, row dory)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(fisherman, row skiff)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(fisherman, row dory)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fisherman, row skiff)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(fisherman, row dory)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fisherman, be at boat)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(fisherman, row dory)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(fisherman, be at boat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(fisherman, row dory)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(fisherman, row dory)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fisherman, row dory)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fisherman, row dory)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(fisherman, row dory)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fisherman, row dory)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(man, row boat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fisherman, row dory)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fish, be at boat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(fisherman, row dory)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(man, row boat)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(fisherman, row dory)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fish, be at boat)