fishing: affect environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents water sport
Weight: 0.69
, attraction
Weight: 0.63
, canoe
Weight: 0.62
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, hobby
Weight: 0.60
Siblings boating
Weight: 0.38
, scuba diving
Weight: 0.35
, rafting
Weight: 0.35
, sailing
Weight: 0.35
, canoeing
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect environment 1.00
be for environment 0.89
help environment 0.88
affect antarctica 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fishing, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(fishing, affect environment)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(fishing, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be for environment)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(fishing, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fishing, help environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(fishing, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(fishing, affect antarctica)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(fishing, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(fishing, help environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(fishing, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(fishing, be for environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(fishing, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(fishing, affect antarctica)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fishing, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(fishing, help environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(fishing, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fishing, help environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fishing, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(fishing, be for environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fishing, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fishing, affect antarctica)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(fishing, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fishing, be for environment)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(fishing, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fishing, affect antarctica)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(fishing, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fishing, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fishing, affect environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fishing, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fishing, affect environment)