fishing: affect antarctica

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents water sport
Weight: 0.69
, attraction
Weight: 0.63
, canoe
Weight: 0.62
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, hobby
Weight: 0.60
Siblings boating
Weight: 0.38
, scuba diving
Weight: 0.35
, rafting
Weight: 0.35
, sailing
Weight: 0.35
, canoeing
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect antarctica 1.00
be in antarctica 0.88
be problem in antarctica 0.80
affect creatures fish etc in sea 0.79
affect environment 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(fishing, affect antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(scuba diving, affect creatures fish etc in sea)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fishing, affect antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(scuba diving, affect creatures fish etc in sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(scuba diving, affect creatures fish etc in sea)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fishing, affect antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(fishing, affect antarctica)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(fishing, affect antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(fishing, be in antarctica)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(fishing, affect antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fishing, affect environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(fishing, affect antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fishing, be problem in antarctica)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fishing, affect antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(fishing, be in antarctica)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fishing, affect antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(fishing, affect environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(fishing, affect antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(fishing, be in antarctica)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(fishing, affect antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be in antarctica)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fishing, affect antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(fishing, be problem in antarctica)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(fishing, affect antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(fishing, be problem in antarctica)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(fishing, affect antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be problem in antarctica)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(fishing, affect antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(fishing, affect environment)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(fishing, affect antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fishing, affect environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(fishing, affect antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fishing, affect antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(fishing, affect antarctica)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fishing, affect antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fishing, affect antarctica)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(fishing, affect antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(scuba diving, affect creatures fish etc in sea)