fishing: be problem in antarctica

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents water sport
Weight: 0.69
, attraction
Weight: 0.63
, canoe
Weight: 0.62
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, hobby
Weight: 0.60
Siblings boating
Weight: 0.38
, scuba diving
Weight: 0.35
, rafting
Weight: 0.35
, sailing
Weight: 0.35
, canoeing
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in antarctica 1.00
has state problem 0.84
be in antarctica 0.84
affect antarctica 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(fishing, be problem in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(fishing, be problem in antarctica)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(fishing, be problem in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(fishing, has state problem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(fishing, be problem in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fishing, has state problem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(fishing, be problem in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(fishing, has state problem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(fishing, be problem in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(fishing, be in antarctica)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(fishing, be problem in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fishing, has state problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(fishing, be problem in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fishing, affect antarctica)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(fishing, be problem in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(fishing, be in antarctica)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(fishing, be problem in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fishing, affect antarctica)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(fishing, be problem in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(fishing, be in antarctica)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(fishing, be problem in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(fishing, affect antarctica)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(fishing, be problem in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be in antarctica)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(fishing, be problem in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(fishing, affect antarctica)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(fishing, be problem in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fishing, be problem in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be problem in antarctica)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(fishing, be problem in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fishing, be problem in antarctica)