fishing: be in antarctica

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents water sport
Weight: 0.69
, attraction
Weight: 0.63
, canoe
Weight: 0.62
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, hobby
Weight: 0.60
Siblings boating
Weight: 0.38
, scuba diving
Weight: 0.35
, rafting
Weight: 0.35
, sailing
Weight: 0.35
, canoeing
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in antarctica 1.00
affect antarctica 0.88
be problem in antarctica 0.84
be in antarctica hunting 0.79
affect creatures fish etc in sea 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(scuba diving, affect creatures fish etc in sea)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(fishing, be in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(scuba diving, affect creatures fish etc in sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(scuba diving, affect creatures fish etc in sea)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(fishing, be in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(fishing, be in antarctica)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(fishing, be in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fishing, be in antarctica hunting)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(fishing, be in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fishing, be in antarctica hunting)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(fishing, be in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fishing, affect antarctica)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(fishing, be in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be in antarctica hunting)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(fishing, be in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fishing, be in antarctica hunting)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(fishing, be in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fishing, be problem in antarctica)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(fishing, be in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fishing, affect antarctica)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(fishing, be in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(fishing, affect antarctica)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(fishing, be in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(fishing, be problem in antarctica)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(fishing, be in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(fishing, affect antarctica)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(fishing, be in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(fishing, be problem in antarctica)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(fishing, be in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be problem in antarctica)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(fishing, be in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(fishing, be in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be in antarctica)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(fishing, be in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(fishing, be in antarctica)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(scuba diving, affect creatures fish etc in sea)