fishing: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents water sport
Weight: 0.69
, attraction
Weight: 0.63
, canoe
Weight: 0.62
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, hobby
Weight: 0.60
Siblings boating
Weight: 0.38
, scuba diving
Weight: 0.35
, rafting
Weight: 0.35
, sailing
Weight: 0.35
, canoeing
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
be problem in antarctica 0.84
has state job 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fishing, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(fishing, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(fishing, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(fishing, has state job)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(fishing, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(fishing, has state job)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(fishing, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be problem in antarctica)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fishing, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(fishing, has state job)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(fishing, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fishing, has state job)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(fishing, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fishing, be problem in antarctica)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(fishing, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(fishing, be problem in antarctica)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fishing, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(fishing, be problem in antarctica)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(fishing, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(fishing, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fishing, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fishing, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(fishing, has state problem)