fishing: has state job

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents water sport
Weight: 0.69
, attraction
Weight: 0.63
, canoe
Weight: 0.62
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, hobby
Weight: 0.60
Siblings boating
Weight: 0.38
, scuba diving
Weight: 0.35
, rafting
Weight: 0.35
, sailing
Weight: 0.35
, canoeing
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state job 1.00
has state jobs 0.88
has state company 0.76
has state problem 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(subject, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fishing, has state job)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fishing, has state job)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(subject, has state jobs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(fishing, has state job)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(subject, has state jobs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(fishing, has state job)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(rafting, has state company)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(subject, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(fishing, has state job)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(fishing, has state job)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fishing, has state job)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(rafting, has state company)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(rafting, has state company)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fishing, has state job)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(fishing, has state job)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(fishing, has state job)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fishing, has state problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(fishing, has state job)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(fishing, has state problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fishing, has state job)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fishing, has state problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(fishing, has state job)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(fishing, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(fishing, has state job)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fishing, has state job)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(fishing, has state job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fishing, has state job)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fishing, has state job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(fishing, has state job)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(subject, has state jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(fishing, has state job)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(rafting, has state company)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(fishing, has state job)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(subject, has state jobs)