fishing: be than better hunting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents water sport
Weight: 0.69
, attraction
Weight: 0.63
, canoe
Weight: 0.62
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, hobby
Weight: 0.60
Siblings boating
Weight: 0.38
, scuba diving
Weight: 0.35
, rafting
Weight: 0.35
, sailing
Weight: 0.35
, canoeing
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be than better hunting 1.00
be more accepted than hunting 0.91
more is accepted than hunting 0.90
be in antarctica hunting 0.88
is fishing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(fishing, be than better hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(fishing, be than better hunting)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(fishing, be than better hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be in antarctica hunting)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(fishing, be than better hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fishing, be in antarctica hunting)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(fishing, be than better hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fishing, be in antarctica hunting)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(fishing, be than better hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(fishing, more is accepted than hunting)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(fishing, be than better hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(fishing, more is accepted than hunting)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(fishing, be than better hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(fishing, be more accepted than hunting)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(fishing, be than better hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fishing, be in antarctica hunting)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(fishing, be than better hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fishing, more is accepted than hunting)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(fishing, be than better hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(fishing, be more accepted than hunting)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(fishing, be than better hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(fishing, is fishing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(fishing, be than better hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be more accepted than hunting)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(fishing, be than better hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(fishing, more is accepted than hunting)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(fishing, be than better hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fishing, be more accepted than hunting)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(fishing, be than better hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(fishing, is fishing)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(fishing, be than better hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(fishing, is fishing)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(fishing, be than better hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fishing, is fishing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(fishing, be than better hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fishing, be than better hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be than better hunting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(fishing, be than better hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fishing, be than better hunting)