fishing: is fishing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents water sport
Weight: 0.69
, attraction
Weight: 0.63
, canoe
Weight: 0.62
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, hobby
Weight: 0.60
Siblings boating
Weight: 0.38
, scuba diving
Weight: 0.35
, rafting
Weight: 0.35
, sailing
Weight: 0.35
, canoeing
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is fishing 1.00
is angling 0.80
be called angling 0.80
be in antarctica hunting 0.78
be than better hunting 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(fishing, is fishing)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(fishing, is fishing)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(fishing, is fishing)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(fishing, is angling)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(fishing, is fishing)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be called angling)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(fishing, is fishing)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be in antarctica hunting)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(fishing, is fishing)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fishing, be in antarctica hunting)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(fishing, is fishing)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fishing, be in antarctica hunting)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(fishing, is fishing)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(fishing, is angling)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(fishing, is fishing)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be than better hunting)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(fishing, is fishing)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(fishing, be called angling)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(fishing, is fishing)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(fishing, be than better hunting)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(fishing, is fishing)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(fishing, be than better hunting)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(fishing, is fishing)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fishing, is angling)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(fishing, is fishing)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(fishing, be called angling)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(fishing, is fishing)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fishing, be in antarctica hunting)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(fishing, is fishing)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(fishing, is angling)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(fishing, is fishing)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(fishing, be called angling)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(fishing, is fishing)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fishing, be than better hunting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(fishing, is fishing)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(fishing, is fishing)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fishing, is fishing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(fishing, is fishing)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(fishing, is fishing)