fission: be more economical than fusion

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents energy
Weight: 0.44
, process
Weight: 0.42
, neutron
Weight: 0.42
, reaction
Weight: 0.40
, fuel
Weight: 0.35
Siblings nuclear fission
Weight: 0.31
, solar energy
Weight: 0.31
, hydrolysis
Weight: 0.30
, fermentation
Weight: 0.30
, combustion
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more economical than fusion 1.00
be better than fusion 0.89
be easier than fusion 0.89
be used instead of fusion 0.85
produce more energy than nuclear fusion 0.84
be different from fusion 0.84
be similar to fusion 0.83
be better than nuclear fusion 0.83
be preferred to fusion 0.83
be called fusion 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be preferred to fusion)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be used instead of fusion)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be easier than fusion)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, produce more energy than nuclear fusion)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be better than nuclear fusion)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be different from fusion)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be similar to fusion)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be called fusion)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(nuclear fission, be better than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(nuclear fission, be easier than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, be easier than fusion)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(nuclear fission, be different from fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, be different from fusion)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(nuclear fission, be similar to fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, be similar to fusion)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(nuclear fission, produce more energy than nuclear fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, produce more energy than nuclear fusion)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(nuclear fission, be called fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, be called fusion)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(nuclear fission, be better than nuclear fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, be better than nuclear fusion)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(nuclear fission, be used instead of fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, be used instead of fusion)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(nuclear fission, be preferred to fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, be preferred to fusion)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(fission, be more economical than fusion)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(fission, be called fusion)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fission, be used instead of fusion)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(fission, be used instead of fusion)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(fission, be used instead of fusion)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(fission, be called fusion)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fission, be similar to fusion)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(fission, be better than fusion)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(fission, be called fusion)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(fission, be easier than fusion)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fission, be better than fusion)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fission, be better than fusion)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(fission, be similar to fusion)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(fission, be easier than fusion)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(fission, be better than fusion)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(fission, be similar to fusion)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(fission, produce more energy than nuclear fusion)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(fission, be easier than fusion)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fission, be easier than fusion)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fission, produce more energy than nuclear fusion)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(fission, be better than nuclear fusion)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(fission, produce more energy than nuclear fusion)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(fission, be better than nuclear fusion)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(fission, be preferred to fusion)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(fission, produce more energy than nuclear fusion)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fission, be preferred to fusion)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fission, be better than nuclear fusion)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(fission, be better than nuclear fusion)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fission, be preferred to fusion)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fission, be preferred to fusion)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fission, be used instead of fusion)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fission, be similar to fusion)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(fission, be called fusion)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fission, be more economical than fusion)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fission, be more economical than fusion)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, be called fusion)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, be used instead of fusion)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, be similar to fusion)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, be different from fusion)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, be better than nuclear fusion)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, be easier than fusion)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, produce more energy than nuclear fusion)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fission, be more economical than fusion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, be preferred to fusion)