fitness: be evolution-natomas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.60
, magazine
Weight: 0.59
, field
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, goal
Weight: 0.58
Siblings air conditioning
Weight: 0.34
, training
Weight: 0.33
, nutrition
Weight: 0.33
, football field
Weight: 0.32
, motivation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be evolution-natomas 1.00
be for walther pk380 0.84
be for organisation 0.84
being is ploughed 0.80
being when is ploughed 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(field, being when is ploughed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(fitness, be evolution-natomas)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(fitness, be evolution-natomas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(field, being when is ploughed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be evolution-natomas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(field, being when is ploughed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be evolution-natomas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(training, be for organisation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(field, being when is ploughed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(fitness, be evolution-natomas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(fitness, be evolution-natomas)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(fitness, be evolution-natomas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(training, be for organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(training, be for organisation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(fitness, be evolution-natomas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(fitness, be evolution-natomas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(fitness, be evolution-natomas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(fitness, be evolution-natomas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be evolution-natomas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(fitness, be evolution-natomas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(fitness, be evolution-natomas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be evolution-natomas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(field, being when is ploughed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be evolution-natomas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(training, be for organisation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(fitness, be evolution-natomas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(field, being when is ploughed)